I have to admit, I expected Illogicopedia to have fulfilled its plans for World Domination at this point. After more than three years on the road, only a
brief mention in a mainstream newspaper blog column and
an insignificant post at starkedsf.com have come close to even recognising Illogicopedia as slightly notable
[citation needed].
Still, the site is at the very least causing some rumbles in the underground niche market with its general nonsensity (is that even a word? It is now) and silliness. Reactions, both positive and negative, are recorded in the vast expanse known as the
Internet Blogosphere (pictured right), i.e. the place where anyone can poke holes in the notability of the Illogicopedia to their heart's content.
Now, I have no idea if any of these guys have an account at Illogico, but at least they've visited and perhaps raised a slight smirk at some of the better articles on the wiki. Maybe.
Most recently, a blogger known only as Captain Cook has found Illogicopedia suitably stupid to include links to it in various posts on his blog, The Sturgeon Awards. Apparently, Illogico is slightly better than
some bloke called Fred, but marginally worse than
KidConfidence, a video game review site for parents (a cracking idea if ever I heard one - certainly worth checking out if only for its comedy value). Cookie, cheers for acknowledging our sorry asses. We are eternally
grapeful.
In October of last year, Nutwood Junction included Illogicopedia in a superb list of parody websites and wikis. Obviously the writers have seen Illogiblog's own
wiki revue (and perhaps even
this general interest article written over a year ago) and developed it into
their own piece on humour wikis. The article quotes '
Slightly Depressed Rainbows', one of the older (and actually not that bad) pages on Illogico, which was apparently found via Special:Random. There's even a mention for
Wickerpedia, which is always worth a visit for a quick laugh.
Elsewhere...I can't quite figure out what the point of
this list is, but I don't think it's worth spending too much brain power on. Carissa Glarner of the Art Institute Int. for Advertising finds Illogicopedia '
simply entertaining'. I dunno if this is meant as positive or negative, but it's a mention nonetheless.
And, um, that's all I can find right now, so I expect there aren't many more mentions than these. If there are, they would be accessible via Google Search or something. Which they aren't.